The Four Unicorns of the Gaypocalypse
Ask me anything
Submit
Archive

The Four Unicorns of the Gaypocalypse

A personal blog. Sometimes I make GIFs.

If white radicals are serious about revolution, they are going to have to discard a lot of bullshit ideology created by and for educated white middle-class males. A good example of what has to go is the popular theory of consumerism.

….

First of all, there is nothing inherently wrong with consumption. Shopping and consuming are enjoyable human activities and the marketplace has been a center of social life for thousands of years.

The locus of the oppression resides in the production function: people have no control over which commodities are produced (or services performed), in what amounts, under what conditions, or how these commodities are distributed. Corporations make these decisions and base them solely on profit potential.

As it is, the profusion of commodities is a genuine and powerful compensation for oppression. It is a bribe, but like all bribes it offers concrete benefits—in the average American’s case, a degree of physical comfort unparalleled in history. Under present conditions, people are preoccupied with consumer goods not because they are brainwashed but because buying is the one pleasurable activity not only permitted but actively encouraged by our rulers. The pleasure of eating an ice cream cone may be minor compared to the pleasure of meaningful, autonomous work, but the former is easily available and the latter is not.

Ellen Willis - Women and the Myth of Consumerism, 1969  (via zhinxy)

THIS WAS WRITTEN IN 1969 BUT WHITE ANARCHISTS EVERYWHERE HAVE MISSED IT.

(via everythingbutharleyquinn)
Reblogged from: everythingbutharleyquinn; source: zhinxy
Nice convention bounce there, Romney.
OK, so he actually did have a bounce, but it was smaller than expected so FiveThirtyEight interprets it as a negative:

Our forecast model builds in an adjustment for the party conventions; it treats anything larger than a 4-point bounce as being a favorable sign for Mr. Romney, and anything smaller than that as being an unfavorable one.
This could change as we get more data, but for the time being it looks like Mr. Romney’s bounce will be a bit shy of that 4-point threshold. Thus, the forecast has moved toward Mr. Obama over the past few days; it now gives him a 74.5 percent chance of winning the Electoral College, his highest figure to date.

Nice convention bounce there, Romney.

OK, so he actually did have a bounce, but it was smaller than expected so FiveThirtyEight interprets it as a negative:

Our forecast model builds in an adjustment for the party conventions; it treats anything larger than a 4-point bounce as being a favorable sign for Mr. Romney, and anything smaller than that as being an unfavorable one.

This could change as we get more data, but for the time being it looks like Mr. Romney’s bounce will be a bit shy of that 4-point threshold. Thus, the forecast has moved toward Mr. Obama over the past few days; it now gives him a 74.5 percent chance of winning the Electoral College, his highest figure to date.

Finland’s awesome, equitable traffic fines

I just learned this AMAZING fact from the Parade of Nations coverage: In Finland, traffic fines are assessed based on income. So they calculate a figure, called a “dayfine,” equal to approximately half your daily disposable income, then multiply that based on the severity of the offense.

I’ve always found our regressive system of flat fines irritating—a fine for the same offense can be devastating to a poor person, but at the same time so trivial to a rich person that it’s barely a deterrent.

But in Finland, the rich pay appropriately huge fines. In 2002, a Nokia executive got a speeding ticket for €116,000, or $103,600—$131,000 in 2012 dollars. And in 2004, the heir to a sausage fortune was fined€170,000, then worth about $204,000, or $248,000 now.

Sounds damn fair if you ask me!

abaldwin360:

Obamacare! Gay marriage! Legalizing drugs! I’m moving to Canada to get away from all of this shit!

Umm… guys, I think there’s some stuff about Canada we need to talk about.

This is the best day.

Reblogged from: gyratingdiscochicken; source: abaldwin360
“The bottom line: the entire Affordable Care Act is upheld, with the exception that the federal government’s power to terminate states’ Medicaid funds is narrowly read.”

From the SCOTUSblog liveblog.

PRAISE JESUS I STILL HAVE HEALTH CARE

elledeau:

If it was true that lower taxes for the rich and more wealth for the wealthy led to job creation, today we would be drowning in jobs.

-Venture Capitalist Nick Hanauer in the “forbidden Ted Talk